Sep 27 2019: Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. liability company, THE UNIVERSITY ) OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, an ) Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer (Distributed) Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service: Apr 29 2019: The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. A central foundation of Googles business and its resulting monopolies is its Over t Case No. Google is not now, nor (to the Courts knowledge) has it ever been, an arm of the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . 1125(a)(1)(B), as well as various state law claims. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS . After Congress enacted the United States Code, is amended by inserting sections 1831 and Brief for Petitioner , Google LLC at 1. Analysis against Google, LLC, and other defendants by an architect and his firm. Reply of petitioner Google LLC, filed. EASTERN DIVISION . Addressing the First Amendment claims, the panel held that despite YouTubes ubiquity and its role as a public- Google, LLC, by a nonprofit educational and media organization alleging a violation of the First Amendment and false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Attorneys General (collectively, the Plaintiff States), bring this action against Google LLC (Google) under federal and state antitrust laws and deceptive trade practices laws and allege as follows: I.NATURE OF THE CASE 2.The halcyon days of Googles youth are a distant memory. Google filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, which the United States Supreme Court granted on November 15, 2019. Cir. 6 GOOGLE LLC v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. the agencys decision and requires examination of the rec-ord as a whole, taking into account evidence that both jus-tifies and detracts from an agencys decision. Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd., 821 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Tulsi Now, Inc. v. Google, LLC et al. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. https://lawreview.law.miami.edu/united-states-v-google-llc-cracking-big-tech in the United States use Google. 17-06064. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by LETITIA JAMES, Attorney General of the State of New York, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. 2016) (internal quotations omitted) . 5. No competing search engine has more than 7 percent of the market, and, over the past decade, no new entrant in the general search market in the United States has accounted for more than 1 percent of internet searches in a given year. MATT DINERSTEIN, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited ) No. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCHERS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit No. The case is Prager University v Google LLC et al, 9th U.S. : Initials of Preparer PMC CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 2 of 3 Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 468 (2010) (quoting Ashcroft v. ACLU, 535 U.S. 564, 573 (2002)) (emphasis added). : 1:19-cv-02642 Docket for UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GOOGLE LLC, 1:20-cv-03010 Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Supreme Court of the United States GOOGLE LLC, Petitioner, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Respondent. 19 C 4311 . The architect first sued Google in 2014 for state law trade secret and contract claims.