phenomenon of competitive authoritarianism, the survival strategies of hegemonic regimes are less explored. Competitive authoritarianism has emerged as a major concept in the study of political regimes. In the wake of the third wave of democratization, competitive authoritarianism has emerged as a prominent regime type. 17 Authoritarianism, then, is characterized simply by the absence of free and fair competition. By contrast, recent coups are much more likely to be followed by competitive elections. Yet, authoritarian resilience remains a feature of post-coup politics, and international sponsorship plays an important role in facilitating post-coup authoritarianism. In such societies, authoritarian attitudes and behavioral patterns which are influenced by social institutions composed in an authoritarian style (family, religious communities, companies, trade unions, etc.) As a consequence of this shift from democracy with adjectives to authoritarianism with adjectives, new terms were derived: electoral authoritarianism, competitive authoritarianism, semi-authoritarianism, soft authoritarianism. Not all of the terms Start studying Competitive Authoritarianism. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026; Corpus ID: 6711009. In recent years, new types of nondemocratic government have come to the fore, notably competitive authoritarianism. : Competitive authoritarian regimes are civilian regimes in which formal democratic institutions are widely viewed as the primary means of gaining power, but in which fraud, civil liberties violations, and abuse of state and media resources so skew the playing field that the regime cannot be labeled democratic. The common feature of authoritarian states is the enforcement of obedience to a central authority at the expense of personal freedoms, rule of law and other constitutional values and principles (Oxford English Dictionary; Linz (2001) 57; Ginsburg and Simpser). It is written so that, with a little guidance, it can be used in both introductory and upper-level courses in comparative politics at the undergraduate level. While political repression exists and human-rights organizations have documented the persecution of journalists and other opponents of the regime, it is fair to say that most Russians today are freer than in any other period of their history. "Competitive Authoritarianism is one of those rare books that no student of comparative politics or international relations can afford to ignore. One of the key features of Geddes (1999, 2003) typology, in contrast with the literature on competitive/electoral authoritarianism, is that it highlights qualitative distinctions among authoritarian regimes. They first introduced the concept of competitive authoritarianism in a 2002 article in the Journal of Democracy. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. As a broad term, authoritarianism refers to arbitrary governmental authority. Patterns of competitive authoritarianism in the Western Balkans Florian Bieber Centre for Southeast European Studies, University of Graz, Graz, Austria ABSTRACT The countries of the Western Balkans during the 1990s were dominated by competitive authoritarian regimes that combined multi-party elections with nationalist rhetoric and the privatisation But the actual policy has under such circumstances strong elements of what could be labelled democratic or competitive authoritarianism. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Democratic backsliding, also known as autocratization and de-democratization, is a gradual decline in the quality of democracy and the opposite of democratization, which may result in the state losing its democratic qualities, becoming an autocracy or authoritarian regime. Thus, the study focuses on the simulation of pluralism as a key feature of hegemonic regimes. But an examination of competitive authoritarianism (CA)the most prominent of these hybrid typessuggests instability is the norm. Competitive authoritarianism has existence of democratic institutions (parties, parliament, elections) and these institutions cannot be abandoned or turned to open falsification by incumbents. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Schumpeter called a democracy an institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people's vote, or even more briefly, a free competition for a free vote. 9 important Features of Grapevine as explained Keith Davis 9 Essential Features of a Federation Explained! Competitive authoritarianism has emerged as a major concept in the study of political regimes. competitive authoritarianism is better equipped to describe the features of Erdoans regime respect to any other type of political system. By installing non-competitive multiparty systems which merely pretend pluralism, these regimes mainta in a strong grip on power. live on and ultimately promote a "culture of authoritarianism" (Mansilla 1995). Juan Linz describes this as a diminished form of authoritarianism. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War @inproceedings{Levitsky2001CompetitiveAH, title={Competitive Authoritarianism: 15 Essential Features of Marxism [] features (Diamond 2002; Karl 1995; Bogaards 2009). What is Competitive Authoritarianism? Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of a strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Competitive Authoritarianism Author: Steven Levitsky Publish On: 2010-08-16 Based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia, this book explores the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008. 1. competitive authoritarianism competitive authoritarianism Levitsky and Way describe, a competitive authoritarianism is, in essence, a democracy but it lacks proportional representation and most of the elections and government institutions are predisposed to only the elites. Drawing partly on Huntington (1991, 110 113), Geddes distinguishes personalist, military, and single-party regimes; she also Competitive authoritarianism is a hybrid regime type, with characteristics of both democracy and authoritarianism.13 We employ a midrange definition of democracy: one that is demanding but mainstream and procedural (Diamond 1999: 13-15) Following Russia is an interesting case because it highlights the key features of the new competitive authoritarianism. Competitive Authoritarianism by Steven Levitsky, 9780521709156, available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Start studying Levitsky and Way "The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism". DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2011.650064; Corpus ID: 143109065. The introduction of this special issue revisits Levitsky and Ways seminal study Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. These regimes feature regular, competitive elections between a government and an opposition, but the incumbent leader or party typically resorts to coercion, intimidation, and fraud to attempt to ensure electoral victory. Competitive authoritarianism must be distinguished from democracy on the one hand and full-scale authoritarianism on the other. Levitsky and Way are the first scholars to engage systematically, and in a global manner, with the analysis of one particular type of hybrid regime: competitive authoritarianism. View Competitive Authoritarianism Research Papers on Academia.edu for free. The study ADVERTISEMENTS: Some of the most important features of authoritarianism are as follows: Related posts: Features of management Systems explained by Koontz and O Donnell 5 Important Features of Unitary State Explained! Some features of the site may not work correctly. Of 35 regimes identified as having been CA between 1990 and 1995, most have either democratized or been replaced by new autocracies. The Authors claim that Turkey transitioned from tutelary democracy to CA since 2010: the end of tutelary democracy in the same period is confirmedby several Turkish scholars (Grsoy 2012;Kuru 80 2. Also, in competitive authoritarian, according to Steven Levitsky, Lukan Way, there are 4 arenas of contestation: elections, parliament, courts and the media (Steven Levitsky, Lukan Way 2002). Based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia, this book explores the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008. Such regimes, though not democratic, feature arenas of contestation in which opposition forces can challenge, and even oust, authoritarian incumbents. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.